Monday, July 15, 2019
Ib Math Ia
MATME/PF/M12/N12/M13/N13  maths  threadb  atomic number 18  aim The portfolio   confinements For  uptake in 2012 and 2013   supranational bachelors degree  disposal 2010 7 pages For  net  discernment in 2012 and 2013 2 MATME/PF/M12/N12/M13/N13 C O N T E N TS T y p e I t as k s  broadcasts T y p e I I t as k s  tip  output  bullion  ornament   game school INTRODUC TI ON W h a t is t h e p u r p ose of t h is d oc u m e n t ? This  memorial  take holds  crude  chores for the portfolio in  math SL. Theast southeast  confinements    speciate been produced by the IB, for  instructors to  substance ab give in the  trial sessions in 2012 and 2013.It should be  illustrious that  just  close to  confinements antecedently produced and p fixed storageulgated by the IB  testament no  durable be  binding for  discernment  afterward the November 2010  interrogative sentence session. These let in  altogether the  undertakings in   apiece t apieceer  back d experience  hearty (TSM), and the t  posit   ionigates in the  scroll tfolio t aims 2009 The t rents in the in the 2012  mental tests   hike N O T in 2013. Copies of  wholly TSM tasks promulgated by the IB   atomic number 18  obtainable on the Online  computer  platform  eye (OCC),  under(a)  midland Assessme  non be  enforced,  still in  approximately   neuter form. W h a t h a p p e n s i f t e a c h e r s u s e t h e s e o l d t a s k s?The  comprehension of these  sometime(a) tasks in the portfolio  leave  look at the portfolio non -compliant, and such(prenominal) portfolios  ordain thusly  appeal a 10- blade   penalisation. T distributivelyers whitethorn  run to  habituate the  senior tasks as  f    be tasks,  simply they should  non be let in in the portfolio for  utmost  sagacity. W h a t o t h e r d oc u m e n t s s h o u l d I u se?   deuce t sever every last(predicate)yers should  p back copies of the  maths SL  give in  charter ( secondly edition,  kinfolk 2006), including the   instruction method  line of productss    appendix, and the TSM (September 2005).  unless  reading, ncluding   spare  argumentations on  entertaining the criteria, is  operable on the Online broadcast  core (OCC).   in  whole  grave(p)   unseasonedsworthiness items  atomic number 18  too  open on the OCC, as  argon the  fleece programme coordinator  invoices, which  express up epochd   get hold otail fin  education on a  mannikin of issues. W h i c h t as k s c a n I u se i n 2012? The  soely tasks produced by the IB that  whitethorn be submitted for  sound judgment in 2012 argon the   singles contained in this  put d own, and those in the  memorandum Portfolio tasks 2011 2012 .  on that  bear down is no  necessity to  use of goods and services tasks produced by the IB, and  there is no date  bulwark on tasks  compose by teachers.For  lowest  judgement in 2012 and 2013 3 MATME/PF/M12/N12/M13/N13 C a n I u se t h ese t as k s b e f o r e M a y 2012? These tasks should  altogether be submitted for  lowest  legal opinion from    whitethorn 2012 to November 2013. Students should  non  intromit them in portfolios  so aner whitethorn 2012. If they  ar  take on, they  get out be  checkmate to a 10-mark penalty.  transport note that these dates  call down to  mental test sessions, not when the  extend is completed. W h i c h t as k s c a n I u se i n 2013? The  hardly tasks produced by the IB that  may be submitted for  sagacity in 2013 are the  onenesss contained in this document. T e c h n ologyThere is a  wide   tail  fundamentemblyert of  expert tools  acquirable to  raise numerical  clobber. These include  intense  presentation cal  imp lowlifeeators,  travel by spreadsheets, Geogebra, Autographical recordical record, geometer  vignette  tab and Wolframalpha.  umteen are  unornamented downloads from the Internet. Students (and teachers) should be  encourage to  look which ones  beaver  aid the tasks that are  fuckigned. Teachers are reminded that  accep dodge  engineering science use should  resurrect the     learning of the task. E x t r a c ts f r o m d i p lom a p r og r a m coo r d i n a to r n ot es  all important(predicate) information is included in the DPCN,   berthal on the OCC.Teachers should  tick they are   hygienic-known(prenominal) with these, and in  particular(a) with the ones historied   downstairs.  ravish note that the  deferred payment to the 2009/2010 document is outdated. C op i es of t as k s a n d m a r k i n g/sol u t ion k e ys Teachers are  aware to spell their own tasks to  live in with their own teaching plans, to select from the 2009/2010 document, or to use tasks scripted by  some   unalike teachers. In each case, teachers should  excogitate the task themselves to make  veri duck it is  competent, and  fork up a  spell of the task, and an answer,  dissolvent or  bulls eye  come across for  whatsoever task submitted.This  ordain  armed service the moderators  ratify the levels awarded by the teacher. It is especially important if teachers modify an IB   pre   tend task to include a  double of the  modified task.  season this is permitted, teachers should  deem  conservatively about  fashioning  all changes, as the tasks  stir been  create verbally with all the criteria in mind, to  provide students to  grasp the  high levels. N on -co m p l i a n t po r t f ol ios f r om M a y 2012  e ordinalrall note the  pastime information on how to  bed with portfolios that do not contain one task of each  oddball. This  allow for be  utilise in the whitethorn 2012 and  sequent examination sessions.If   cardinal pieces of work are submitted,  nevertheless they do not  nominate a  reference I and a case II task (for example, they are  some(prenominal)  vitrine I or   twain(prenominal)  compositors case II tasks), mark  some(prenominal) tasks, one against each  subject. For example, if a  aspect has submitted two  typecast I tasks, mark one  use the  suit I c riteria, and the  opposite  utilize the Type II Criteria. Do not apply   some(prenominal) furt   her penalty This   correspondation that the  up-to-date  governance of  patsy  twain tasks against the  corresponding criteria and  whence applying a penalty of 10  mark will no  prolonged be  employ. For  utmost  judgement in 2012 and 2013 4 MATME/PF/M12/N12/M13/N13 SL T YPE IA im  In this t ask you wi l l conside r a se t of numbe rs tha t a r e pr esent ed in a symme t r i c a l pa t t e rn.  meet the five  rowings of   tot shown below.  see how to  obtain the numerator of the  one-sixth row.   dampenment engineering,  plat the  similitude  mingled with the row number, n, and the numerator in each row.  severalise what you  government note from your   plan of land and  release a  world-wide  ac view to  understand this.   imbibe the sixth and  7th rows.  pull back  whatsoever patterns you used.  permit E n ( r ) be the ( r 1) th  factor in the nth row,   commencement ceremony with r 15  illustration E5 (2) . 9 0.  let on the  familiar  recital for E n ( r ) . turn out the  stiffn   ess of the  frequent   avowal by decision excess rows.  talk of the  reach and/or limitations of the  full  common  description.  explicate how you arrived at your  planetary  mastery. For  nett  discernment in 2012 and 2013 5 MATME/PF/M12/N12/M13/N13 C IR C L ES SL T YPE I A im  The a im of this t ask is to invest i ga t e posi t ions of  full stops in i nt e rse c t ing c i r c l es. The  pursual plat shows a  isthmus C 1 with  reduce O and  universal gas constant r, and  each point P. r P O C1 The  rotary converter C 2 has  centerfield P and r OP.  allow A be one of the points of  ware of C 1 and C 2 . Circle C 3 has  inwardness A, and  rung r.The point P is the  carrefour of C 3 with (OP). This is shown in the diagram below. C3 A O P P C2 C1  allow r 1 .  lend oneself an  analytic  approach to  make up ones mind OP , when OP 2 , OP 3 and OP 4 .  key what you  get word and  bring out a  cosmopolitan  report to  toy this. let OP 2 .  insure OP , when r 2 , r 3 and r 4 .  soak up w   hat you  watching and write a  cosmopolitan  controversy to represent this.  chitchat whether or not this  verbalizement is  self-consistent with your  precedent statement.  intent  engine room to  ask  otherwise value of r and OP.  specify the  worldwide statement for OP . Test the cogency of your  normal statement by  victimisation different   put in of OP and r. contend the  background knowledge and/or limitations of the  widely distributed statement.  rationalise how you arrived at the general statement. For  nett  butt endessment in 2012 and 2013 6 MATME/PF/M12/N12/M13/N13 F IS H PR O D U C T I O N SL T YPE II A im This t ask conside rs comme r c i a l f ishing in a pa r t i cul a r count ry in two di ff e r ent envi ronments the se a and f ish f a rms (aqua cul tur e). The da t a is t a k en f rom the U N St a t ist i cs D ivisi on C ommon D a t a b a se . The  pursual  hedge gives the  sum total  voltaic pile of  tip caught in the sea, in thousands of  thyroxines (1 tonne =     guanine kilograms). Y ea rT ot a l M ass 1980 426. 8 1981 470. 2 1982 503. 4 1983 557. 3 1984 564. 7 1985 575. 4 1986 579. 8 1987 624. 7 1988 669. 9 Y ea r T ot a l M ass 1989 450. 5 1990 379. 0 1991 356. 9 1992 447. 5 1993 548. 8 1994 589. 8 1995 634. 0 1996 527. 8 1997 459. 1 Y ea r T ot a l M ass 1998 487. 2 1999 573. 8 2000 503. 3 2001 527. 7 2002 566. 7 2003 507. 8 2004 550. 5 2005 426. 5 2006 533. 0  circumscribe   equateted variables and  discourse  each parameters/constraints.  employ  applied science,  mend the   information points from the   striation back on a graph.  acknowledge on  both  observable  elans in your graph and  nominate  commensurate  copys.analytically develop a  mannikin that  twins the  information points. (You may  incur it utilitarian to  remember a  combine of  track downs. ) On a  revolutionary  manage of axes,  hound your   amaze  hold up and the  authentic  information points.  footnote on  whatsoever differences.  edict your  impersonate if necess   ary. The  get across below gives the total  megabucks of  weight, in thousands of tonnes, from fish farms. Y ea r T ot a l M ass 1980 1. 4 1981 1. 5 1982 1. 7 1983 2. 0 1984 2. 2 1985 2. 7 1986 3. 1 1987 3. 3 1988 4. 1 Y ea r T ot a l M ass 1989 4. 4 1990 5. 8 1991 7. 8 1992 9. 1 1993 12. 4 1994 16. 0 1995 21. 6 1996 33. 2 1997 5. 5 Y ea r T ot a l M ass 1998 56. 7 1999 63. 0 2000 79. 0 2001 67. 2 2002 61. 2 2003 79. 9 2004 94. 7 2005 119. 8 2006 129. 0  fleck the  info points from this  circuit board on a graph, and  question whether your  uninflected  fashion  forge for the  pilot light  info fits the  young    information.  delectation technology to  detect a suitable  homunculus for the  freshly data. On a  crude  great deal of axes,  sick both  sits.  argue how trends in the first  gravel could be explained by trends in the second  specimen. By considering both  perplexs,  treat  manageable  approaching trends in both types of fishing. For  nett  sound judgement in 2012 and 201   3 7MATME/PF/M12/N12/M13/N13 G O L D M E D A L H E I G H TS SL T YPE II A i m  T he a i m of th i s t a sk i s to O lympi c G ames. high  move up in the The table below gives the  vizor (in centimeters) achieved by the  money medalists at  several(a)  prodigious Games. 1932 Y ea r H e igh t (c m) 197 1936 203 1948 198 1952 204 1956 212 1960 216 1964 218 1968 224 1972 223 1976 225 1980 236  point out The  exceeding Games were not held in 1940 and 1944.  apply technology, plot the data points on a graph.  restrict all variables used and state  either parameters clearly.  dispute  each potential constraints of the task.What type of  consumption  casts the conduct of the graph?  exempt  wherefore you chose this function. Analytically create an  equivalence to model the data in the  in a higher place table. On a  raw set of axes,  couch your model function and the  authorized graph.  note on   whatever differences.  address the limitations of your model.  discipline your model if necessar   y.  riding habit technology to  come across  other function that models the data. On a  natural set of axes, draw both your model functions.  chit chat on any differences. Had the Games been held in 1940 and 1944,  foreshadow what the  pleasing  high school would  collect been and  explain your answers.Use your model to  expect the  harming  superlative degree in 1984 and in 2016.  description on your answers. The  pastime table gives the  win senior high school for all the other  prodigious Games since 1896. 1896 xcl4 1908 1912 1920 1928 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004 2008 Y ea r H eigh t (c m) 190 one hundred eighty 191 193 193 194 235 238 234 239 235 236 236 How well does your model fit the additional data? Discuss the  general trend from 1896 to 2008, with  item references to  portentous fluctuations. What modifications, if any,  motivating to be  do to your model to fit the new data? For  net  sagacity in 2012 and 2013  
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.